Friday, November 4, 2016

Two guilty verdicts, but somehow not hitting the target

The Bridgegate matter may have reached some kind of climax, but the saga isn’t over, though it may get less-rapt attention from the public from here on


It’s been seemingly a super-long haul since March 2014 when I wrote this rather too-fancy but short comment on the Mastro report in the Bridgegate matter.

Now that, today, guilty verdicts have been returned on Bill Baroni and Bridget Kelly, I would only remark that Kelly showed herself, in the trial, as you could pretty much infer from all I’d read before and since—as having been a “super-admin” in Christie’s overheated administration, not a major administrator with consequential powers of decision.

Anyone who’s worked for “too long” in New Jersey knows that any organization here, governmental or business-oriented, with a lot of power and not always the best motives, embraces the wisdom that a “super-admin” is what you need to conduct your business, seedy or not: someone to send the e-mails, arrange the events, do a lot of high-tech secretarial work…but not draw up the protocol of the “Wansee Conference” of the organization.

I think Kelly got a bad deal in this—of course, she will probably appeal.

But it’s also too bad that of all the players in this mess, only these two people were actually found guilty of anything. Not an original observation.