Wednesday, July 16, 2014

Movie break (Summer Lite): An adoptive father burrows into delivering spiritual* health to his child’s birth mother—a seasoned prostitute: Mighty Aphrodite (1995)

Eighth in a series: Post–Soviet Union Adventure, Days of Clintons Past: A recollection of cultural ephemera of the 1990s

Also fits this series:
“We’ll always have Woody”: A look at Woody Allen films

[Edits 7/17/14. Part 2, posted 12/5/14 on my other blog, is here.]
 
*The term spiritual gets used by different people in different ways, ranging from addressing someone (or an attitude) oriented to religious concerns defined in traditional ways, to someone (or an attitude) oriented to idealistic, intellectual endeavor (as opposed to materialistic concerns). Here, the idea is to reflect Allen’s character’s concern for a relatively debauched or deprived woman whose quality of life that he feels could and should be improved in a fundamentally significant way.

Subsections below:
Not a bad entry in the Doumanian series
A relatively humdrum setup shows some standard Allen moves, but this phase is short

To come in a future entry:
The Greek chorus gets lighter and more fun as the film kicks into gear, and Linda Ash enters the picture
How dumb is Linda Ash? Not like you might think
Sage words from Sorvino, in recent years


Not a bad entry in the Doumanian series

By the time you reach this film if you’re marching through Woody Allen’s oeuvre, you know you’re no longer in his best run of films. This wasn’t on my short list of 1990s Allen films to cover, but once I managed to get a copy of the film (End note), I was actually surprised to discover the fun aspects of it. I mean, it’s by no means great Allen, but it manages to squeak out, through its one hour and 37 minutes, a good fistful of fun (even with some of what seem the inevitable Jean Doumanian era touches, like stock show-bizzy ingredients that Allen wouldn’t have been quick to adopt in the past—such as a musical number at the end—and an increasing presence of colorful—curse-word—language that was not typical of Allen before).

And it has an interesting, even downright enlivening, performance by Mira Sorvino, whom this film apparently launched as a star in its day. I mean, in this larky story she isn’t Meryl Streep–great, but she still gives a good performance—for this, she did win an Oscar as Best Supporting Actress—and her part/performance actually makes the film. In fact, if it wasn’t for this, the film would be a whimsical item, with some developing fun with its Greek chorus, but overall a somewhat flat addition to Allen’s body of work, which by 1995 over 25+ years was pretty voluminous already.

I will start this review here, and will follow this up with a fuller treatment within coming weeks. Since I now own the VHS tape I got from the library, there’s no time constraint.

Allen in Eric Lax, Conversations with Woody Allen (Knopf, 2007), talks about having wanted to do a film with a Greek chorus (good grief, plenty of us have all kinds of wishes—a certain kind of car, achieving a certain level of art, or making more money—but Allen had that kind of wish!). He combined this with an itch he had to write on a man’s discovering the mother of his adopted child…and presto, the basic structure of this story was born. (Lax, pp. 49-50)


A relatively humdrum setup shows some standard Allen moves, but this phase is short

The first 18 or so minutes of the film is essentially setup. If this type of stuff weren’t limited to setup but characterized the whole film, Aphrodite would seem a pretty dreary “also-ran” exercise of Allen’s. We start with Allen’s character Lenny Weinrib, a sports writer, with three other people at a Manhattan café table, and they are talking typical Allen adult characters’ talk in such a setting. Lenny had had a first wife, who hadn’t wanted a child, and he has a current wife, Amanda (played by Helena Bonham Carter), and Amanda—present in the conversation—hadn’t wanted a child…but now, in a welcome enough idea, she does, though the possibility of adoption also comes up….

By now, the cinematography by Carlo Di Palma is familiar, and on the dull side. Colors, as usual, “warmish” and abetted by the deep-focus approach, seem a bit flat; and here, among the four characters at the round table in the café, the second male of the two couples has his back to the camera almost the entire time (which film students would say goes to the issue of blocking, and how here, this male actor seems completely disserved by how the blocking excludes him from being shown clearly within from the long take). Di Palma, as usual, accommodates the shifting focus of the conversation with gentle pannings or such of the camera, while by now Allen is all about master shots, not many little close-ups to different characters’ points of view.

There are other scenes, including an element of marital troubles that seem to precondition Lenny and Amanda’s adopting a child (actually, the potential of an extramarital affair between Amanda and her boss at an art gallery runs through a fair amount of the film, independent of the adoption-related concerns) . They have trouble having sex at one point, though this seems a definite precondition for Lenny's wanting to find out about the identity of the birth mother. All the familial-issue setup seems (at least sometimes) like warmed-over (or out-take quality) types of situations from Husbands and Wives. On first viewing of all this stuff, we can be generous enough in allowing it; Allen’s familiar cityscape couples with their issues have a certain charm (and all the more today, when we see this alternative to the fantasy-and-Spandex films so prevalent today, we understand how, when Allen’s screenplays and actors still get Oscar nods, this seems to be at least a sort of Academy protest vote against the prevalence of “cotton candy for the mind” that fill the cineplexes as much as a vote for Allen’s talent/achievement).

Soon, the couple has a delightful baby boy, adopted from a mother who had just given him up. Weinrib and Amanda debate (sometimes amusingly) over names. There is a scene with gifts accumulating at Christmas (my mistake; on third viewing, it seems a birthday party for the boy, Max).

The familial “dark clouds on the horizon,” comprising the plotline of Amanda having some kind of affair, not entirely unknown to Lenny, with her boss at the gallery, Jerry Bender (actor Peter Weller), certainly motivates some of Lenny's actions, though it seems a little "heavy weather" compared to what, in much of the rest of the film, seems playful enough. This aspect, early on, seems almost tiresome—Allen seems to have a giant “idea jar” in his office loaded with little scraps of paper, 90 percent of which have to do with an extramarital affair.

But this all leads—inexorably, or (alternatively) as a matter of fateful hubris, Allen would want to say (which the presence of a commenting chorus helps convey)—to Weinrib’s becoming set on finding out his son Max’s birth mother. This is because Max is so smart, there must be something stellarly talented about the mother, or some such hypothesis. And when Weinrib finally meets the mother, the film is full tilt into how much fun it can be.

I will continue this review in the future.


End note.

Actually, I got the VHS tape free from a library in Morris County, N.J., that was discarding it and its other VHS tapes—one little blessing of the massive cultural shift of moving on from such previous givens as “your father’s digital technology.”

Sunday, July 13, 2014

OFAD #4: A trip to the ER with my mother last week, and interacting with a “crazygirl” loitering there

Getting to know our local health-care facilities and culture in, sometimes, a tumbling/turmoil way

[Note: The term crazygirl may seem disrespectful, but it’s used with a particular purpose amid more ambiguity-respecting, and good-faith, considerations. Edits 7/14/14. Edit 8/6/14: a "sequel" to this entry is viewable here.]

I may have seemed incommunicado in this space lately, but I have no shortage of blog pieces, for both blogs, that I’m working on. And actually, amid all else going on last week—summer swelter (with, for me, the humid air making breathing and sweating not the best), freelance work, etc.—suddenly my mother had to go to the emergency room, on Wednesday, which ER was at the Newton Medical Center, formerly Newton Memorial Hospital. This was the first time she’d ever been there in this capacity.

I originally wanted to write on the whole experience, which ran until Friday (she was an inpatient about a day and a half)—first in order just to put it all in perspective for myself, and then to somehow (as seemed appropriate, if it did) fashion it for a blog entry, with specific ethical points made. But I held off, out of a mix of “fatigue” and discretion…but one particular aspect of this experience stood out as worthy of blog treatment.

The aspect had to do with a “crazygirl” who was present at the ER.

Background:

Last Tuesday, as soon as I got home from my work outing for that day, my mother had wanted to be driven down to the A&P in town to pick up enemas (not a typical request of hers). She was stopped up, so to speak, but this was an unusual experience; she had pain and/or other ill feeling. She had something of an acute crisis. Her not feeling well not only made her “raring to go” just as I got back—with a quick break for me to eat a salad she’d made me, so I had something for dinner—but it left her requiring me to drive, because that’s how out of sorts she felt. She had felt so unwell, she didn’t even want to eat dinner herself. So I took her down to the A&P, and she got what she wanted to pick up (not just the enemas, but other items, including meds from the in-store pharmacy), and we were back home.

Next day, Wednesday, in the morning, preparing for a normal day for myself, I played things by ear: How did she feel? Did she feel more like eating normally? Etc. As it turned out, she would not do her weekly shopping at a Franklin Borough supermarket as she usually did on a Wednesday, so she was definitely, still, out of sorts.

Adjusting my own schedule to her schedule change, this past Wednesday, as was atypical of my weekly schedules, was one that I had a long day on the road, with a lot of work gotten done at one library. It was a day to “make hay while the sun shone.” I didn’t anticipate a crisis when I got home just about the time dinner would have been ready, about 5 p.m. But—quite unexpectedly for me—now she felt bad enough, she wanted to go to the acute care facility in Vernon Township, a new place that had opened not long ago at the location of what had once been called Great Gorge South (the latter is still a solid part of the skiing complex in the valley). This new acute care place replaced an acute care facility that had been further north on Route 94.

She couldn’t eat, was still constipated, had pains in her lower abdomen…. So I drove her to the acute care place.


First stop: the acute care place

The New York Times just had an article last week on a developing economic area of a new medical-facility gold rush: acute care facilities (of a stand-alone sort), which are exempt from some of the laws imposed on ERs (which latter require all to be served, even Medicaid hobos, like me), and now regarded as a promising avenue for Wall Street investors. “Make dollar, make dollar!,” you know. Leave that general stuff aside (and anyway, I don’t know how relevant the gold-rush trend is to the particular place we went to…). [Added 7/14/14: In case confusion of terms and concepts occurs, the Times article I referred to was in the July 10 issue, starting on the front page; it references, among other things, "one of the fastest-growing segments of American health care: urgent care, a common category of walk-in clinics with uncommon interest from Wall Street." Today, an article appeared on the Times Web site heralding the opening of a stand-alone "emergency room" at the site of the former St. Vincent's hospital in Greenwich Village; the article makes the distinction between acute-care facilities, which it alleges provide certain types of care at relatively low cost, and stand-alone emergency rooms such as that focused on in the article, which can provide a portal to inpatient care at an affiliated hospital (where, common assumptions would suggest, care isn't discounted).]  

Well, very long story short, we spent maybe an hour and a half, maybe longer there. After a make-or-break computerized processing of her insurance info was made, she got looked at by a doctor she had never met before. (This was while her usual “primary,” located in his solo-practitioner office in the building where the older acute care facility used to be, wasn’t someone she could easily see in these circumstances, as a simple practical matter. But as it would turn out, the facilities that would deal with her in the several-day whirlwind of care that started this day would fax or electronically send all, or the most key, of the records on it to him.) The determination was made that Wednesday evening to have her go to the ER at Newton Medical Center. She could get a CT (CAT) scan right away, she was told. The requisition from the doc she’d seen was faxed over. So, back on the road.


To the ER

Now the real fun began. (Note: This is not a grump about alleged substandard practice at the hospital. For all I know, it fit within all applicable standards. But this didn’t make it all an access of joy.)

We got to the ER at about 7:40 (it takes about 35-40 minutes to get from home to the Newton hospital, and from the Great Gorge site, it probably took about 25 minutes). Then we waited and waited in the waiting room…and finally (well after 9 p.m., I believe) she was brought in to a bed when it became available. And then we waited there even longer (I sitting near her like an ever-patient aide). Blood was taken…and even, after a while, a chest X-ray was taken! For the eventual CT, she was given contrast to drink (not barium).

She wasn’t taken in to the CT room until after midnight. We were told results would come “soon.” “Soon” turned out to be after about 1:20 a.m. When a doctor finally told her she would be admitted as an inpatient, I decided to leave; I felt I was no longer needed. I got home maybe 2:15 a.m. I got less than four hours of sleep that night. The one saving grace about driving home that late is that, on Route 94 from Newton to Vernon—which during an average day can be tedious, with slow pokes and balky trucks “hanging you up”—you can keep moving (especially with streetlights in your favor) the entire way, even if your brain seems half-melted from tiredness. A few deer were in random locations on the roadside, picked out by headlights in the damp summer night, but no real danger.

##

Well, this just starts the story of the several-day odyssey, which was most grueling for my mother. But my real focus here was meant to be the “crazygirl.”

Shortly after we got into the ER—and, you know, by and large, the random collection of people there were not, I would safely say, a bunch of feckless layabouts who habitually chose the ER over normal, insured medical care and therefore drove up the costs for everyone, as was one reigning canard during the media cheerleading in 2013 for the ACA—a young woman was waiting in the spacious ER waiting room, pacing about. She had an outfit that looked like surgical scrubs, worn over more “civilian” clothing. I hypothesized/assumed she was a nurse, either coming on duty or going off. But even for a nurse, she had (to my mind) a rather boorish manner.

At one point she spoke to a man who was in vivid pain (who was moving about haltingly, tenderly, and clutching one side of his abdomen), about whose apparent problem she said he had “appendicitis.” And she gave ostensibly encouraging words about what he was doing, as if his expressing the pain was helping him. By this set of advice (and not hearing quite all of it), I thought all the more she was quite possibly a nurse.

She hung around, paced here and there. She disappeared around corners (as if she knew her business there), came back. Before too long, her not being a nurse became more evident. Was she a patient? Waiting to get in to a bed? If so, why the surgical scrubs?


The mysterious girl asks a bizarre question

At one point she was standing near us, and she had taken off her surgical-scrubs top, revealing some rather ratty summertime halter top or the like, with her surgical-scrubs pants still on. She accidentally dropped the scrubs top on the floor. When she was standing near myself and my mother—and the two of us had, by now, grown weary with the extremely long wait already—I said to the young woman, “Miss? You dropped that—” and pointed to the top crumpled on the floor.

She uttered something like thanks, then picked up the item of clothing. And pretty soon she faced us, and asked a question that, for a moment, I wondered whether I really heard: “Do you guys like speed?” I watched her a brief moment and, opting to nip a potential problem in the bud, said confidently, “No.” As if to say, ‘I don’t quite know what you are meaning, but our answer is No.’

At some point in this, my mother gave me a puzzling look or such. She was much less apt to address the young woman at any point in the latter’s rambling presence in the waiting room.

A day or so later, when my mother and I talked about this exchange, and by that time we had concluded the young woman was mentally ill, I said that with her puzzling question, she seemed to ask us if we “liked” or “‘did,’ and hence liked,” speed in the sense of uppers, or amphetamines. (My mother said she hadn’t heard her—i.e., made out what she said, though she knew she addressed us.) I said it was typical of druggie types—she knew this concept pretty well, if not all its implications—to broach that sort of topic that way, as if to see if you were “cool,” as the old 1970s concept was (for a “Can you relate to me?” litmus test). What, in this case, took this craziness “to the next level” was the young woman’s asking this in a public place, and especially (apparently) thinking that my mother, who must have looked over 70, would do speed. That is, the lack of common sense was quite big.


Final disposition of the crazygirl

Well, back to the ER scene, pre-postmortem. The young woman eventually spent a lot of time talking to a young man well on the other side of the big waiting room from my mother and myself, and not all of her words were clear to me, though there was something that struck me as importunate and a little weird about her manner of talking.

The young man she was talking to would turn out to be a sober-minded-enough sort who—after the young woman had left the ER entirely—would eventually go in (as invited) to the bed area of the ER, as a genuine patient. But before this, at one point, with the young woman still in importunate-talking mode, another young man headed out the entrance/exit doors, and gestured with a circling finger near his ear, directed to the first young man (and out of sight of the young woman) as to say confidently, “She’s cuckoo!”

At another point, in her rambling talk to the waiting young man, she made reference to having been considered to have something wrong in her head, in the way of someone psychologically ill who gives some hint about such without being fully conscious of this, and without accordingly being considerate of her position in the ongoing context. (This analyzes and infers hopefully not too much beyond what there was to witness that night as she talked.) [Added 7/14/14: She took the step of looking more like an oddball when she picked up one of the surgical-type masks, which were in a dispenser for any comers to the ER to use if they feared infection--and no one else there when we were there was using one--and she started wearing it. So, with her somewhat frumpy surgical scrubs, her slightly dysphoric eyes, and her odd way of talking, she gave more of an immediate clue that she was an off-putting eccentric once she had that surgical mask on.]  

##

Finally, after about an hour or so of the young woman being in that room, by this point with her clearly giving no evidence of being someone who worked there—nor being someone seeking medical treatment as is usually done in an ER—a couple of the workers there took action. It hadn’t taken a specific complaint from anyone, I believe. They just took until then to do something.

A woman from in back—a sort of supervisor, I assumed—and a security guard, whom I’d earlier seen passing through, looking at the young woman with a confident eye as if he knew full well what kind of recognizable quantity she was, and as if she’d been there before—both went with her outside, and apparently gave her a decisive talking-to. Before long, an SUV appeared outside the ER’s entry doors, and the young woman got into it and headed off, as if having requested of significant others (by phone) to be taken home, a little chastened.


Our suffering the less-than-healthy

I don’t think I need to draw too many conclusions here—and anyway, there is enough sheer phenomena going on within the territory of the massive U.S. health-care “system” where we all can see “new wondrous sights and new causes for pause”—but one point can be made this way. When I talked with my mother about this young woman a day or so later—and I generalized in relation to the people I typically had dealt with in the support-group milieu at the Newton hospital a decade or more before—I said that other such people (of this woman’s gender and age) were not hard to deal with, as suffering some kind of psych disorder—mainly because they knew they had such a disorder, as their being in the support-group milieu directly implied. This woman, however, didn’t seem to have full understanding of being psychologically ill, with the net result of her being something of a pest in the ER to other people (least helpfully, to waiting patients).

Even so, this particular woman hadn’t bothered me that much; she was somewhat drolly amusing. But my mother seemed to regard her askance (in memory and in the abstract, as well as she had in the concrete at the time) in a rather tough, uncomprehending way.

(As to whether I would be inclined to get involved in the psych support-group culture in the county again: no. Did my part in that already, with the positives coming from the graces of constructive fellow patients. There are others today who can help out that situation.)

I don’t know if this makes more-severe value judgments about the phenomena than are justified. But anyway, this crazygirl stuff was one part of our several-day hospital involvement, but it was the most spicy and moral-question-raising.