Monday, November 23, 2015

Footnote on points in “Passing of a seminal p-doc—an obit…”

This entry footnotes this previous entry.


I. Discoverers of (and researchers on efficacy of) chlorpromazine:

Pierre Deniker and Jean Delay, as discoverers of the therapeutic use of chlorpromazine, are mentioned in a number of eminent sources. What I show below ranges from publications out from 1981 through 2001, covering about a 20-year period, and reflecting history going back about 30 years before 1981. Among sources:

Breggin. Peter R. Breggin’s Psychiatric Drugs: Hazards to the Brain (Springer, 1983) makes mention on pp. 12-13. (Breggin, as it happens and related to various topics throughout this book, uses Ross J. Baldessarini, M.D., as a reference at times; these two doctors are Harvard-educated [Breggin] or affiliated [Baldessarini].)


Baldessarini/Goodman & Gilman’s. Most respectably, in the 2001 (10th) edition of Goodman & Gilman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (New York: McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division, 2001), in the article “Drugs and the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders[:] Psychosis and Mania,” by Ross J. Baldessarini and Frank I. Tarazi, there is this:

“Phenothiazine compounds were synthesized in Europe in the late nineteenth century as part of the development of aniline dyes such as methylene blue. In the late 1930s, a phenothiazine derivative, promethazine, was found to have antihistaminic and sedative effects. Attempts to treat agitation in psychiatric patients with promethazine and other antihistamines followed in the 1940s, but with little success.

“[Research on the ability of promethazine to prolong barbiturate sleeping time, and subsequent work in its use in clinical anesthesia,…] prompted a search for other phenothiazine derivatives with anesthesia-potentiating actions, and in 1940-1950 [Paul] Charpentier synthesized chlorpromazine. Soon thereafter, [Henri] Laborit and his colleagues described the ability of this compound to potentiate anesthetics and produce ‘artificial hibernation.’ [See below on Neil Carlson regarding Laborit and Charpentier.] Chlorpromazine by itself did not cause a loss of consciousness but diminished arousal and motility, with some tendency to promote sleep. These central actions became known as ataractic or neuroleptic soon thereafter.

“The first attempts to treat mental illness with chlorpromazine were made in Paris in 1951 and early 1952 by Paraire and Sigwald…. In 1952, Delay and Deniker became convinced that chlorpromazine achieved more than symptom relief of agitation or anxiety and that it had an ameliorative effect upon psychotic processes in diverse disorders. In 1954, Lehmann and Hanrahan in Montreal [these two researchers are mentioned in Breggin’s book, pp. 13-14], followed by Winkelman in Philadelphia, reported the initial use of chlorpromazine in North America for the treatment of psychomotor excitement and manic states as well as schizophrenia…. Clinical studies [no particular researchers are noted] soon revealed that chlorpromazine was effective in the treatment of psychotic disorders of various types.” [end of subsection on the history of the drugs in this book]  (p. 486)


Carlson’s 1981 textbook. Neil R. Carlson, a professor at the University of Massachusetts in about 1981, in his textbook Physiology of Behavior, second edition (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 1981), lists two Deniker and Delay studies presented at the same congress in 1952:

“Le traitement des psychoses par une methode neurolytique derivee d’hibernotheraphie […; my rough translation: “The treatment of the psychoses by a neurolytic method derived from hibernation-type–therapy”—see three paragraphs above for a reference to “artificial hibernation”].” This was in Comptes Rendus Congres des Medecins Alienistes et Neurologistes de France et des Pays de Langue Francaise. [rough translation: “Reproduced accounts [reports] of the Congress of Psychiatrists and Neurologists of France and Francophone Countries.”] 1952, volume 50, pp. 497-502. [accents omitted from French words; some adaptation of the original reference’s mechanical styling is done; this title and source are also listed in Breggin’s book noted above, but the spelling of some of the French words is different there, maybe in error]

A second paper is noted in Carlson by the same authors: “38 cas de psychoses traitees par la cure prolongee et continuee de 4560 RP.” In Comptes… [same congress publication as above], pp. 503-513. [Breggin does not mention this paper.]

Carlson also, in his history of the development of antipsychotic medication, mentions (as does Baldessarini in Goodman & Gilman’s) Henri Laborit and Paul Charpentier (p. 668); and Deniker and Delay (p. 669). In terms of double-blind studies used for antipsychotic drugs, Carlson (p. 669) mentions Baldessarini’s first edition of Chemotherapy in Psychiatry (Harvard University Press, 1977) as reflecting the repeated achievement of this, without citing other researcher names.


II. How other antipsychotics were discovered, to ~1980

Carlson writes, in relation to a 1979 paper by Baldessarini on the side effect (based on long-term use) of tardive dyskinesia: “This is a good place to mention a possible problem that is inherent in the current [to ~1980] screening process used by pharmaceutical companies to identify new drugs that may have antischizophrenic effects…. The usual procedure is to make compounds whose molecular structure resembles that of known antischizophrenic drugs. The compounds are given to rats or mice, and those that produce motor disturbances (Parkinson-like symptoms) are investigated further. In general, motor disturbances and antischizophrenic effects go hand-in-hand, but if some compound had an antischizophrenic effect without motor side effects (which would be very desirable), it would not be discovered by this procedure.” (p. 682)