Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Movie break (Quick Vu): A brilliant con artist meets his match (and savior) in an intrepid G-man: Catch Me If You Can (2002*)

*This film was released on Christmas Day 2002, but I think it did most of its business in 2003.

[This is meant to be a sketchy review, and maybe I’ll add to it if I see the film again soon.]


This film depicts the 1960s with flavorful soundtrack—“The Look of Love” for a call-girl scene, “The Lady from Ipanema” for another scene; The Kinks’ “You Really Got Me” for a raucous party scene. Are we back in innocent times? Not quite. Threading his way through 45-year-old history—pretending to be an airline pilot (in the days in which consumer air flight had a newly prestigious aura); later pretending to be a doctor in Georgia; etc.—is a young man, Frank William Abagnale, Jr., whose con artist skills (in ~1967) seem to make him decades ahead of his time. He pulls off cons that determine the rest of his life (prison, and later more or less “pressed” service in designing check security for banks, with him paid millions for the effort, according to end titles), all by age 19.


Leo DiCaprio as a nimble Frank, with Walken as a sort of loyal father

Leonardo DiCaprio has a sort of feline way of handling his gait at times, but he depicts the male complexities of Frank in his character arc from young kid pulling off stunts (~1967) to more jaded crook in shackles (1969). Even his voice changes. Earnest and youthful when he’s young, he sounds more like a bit of a punk with a hardened-character Long Island accent in his 1969 incarnation (along with style-of-the-times long hair).

Christopher Walken, with his typical pause-rich style of speaking making him one of the true weirdos among U.S. male actors who’ve been around 30 or more years, is Frank’s father. With a Long Island–ish accent and a stab at Italian flavor to some of his speech, this father seems to try hard to support his family—the one other member is his French-born wife, whom he met during his service in World War II (and his being the only American to take her home as a mate is a landmark event the family seems to make a ritual of noting on occasion). Later in the movie we find he runs a stationers’ store.

But he seems to run afoul of the “financial authorities”—he has an ongoing battle with the IRS over back taxes (actual tax fraud, we hear about), alluded to in the film in a few places. He gets frustrated enough (and has enough moxie) to want to sue the IRS. Early on, the family must “downsize” their lifestyle—get rid of the old Caddy, move into a more affordable home. Eventually the mother and father split (she will eventually marry an associate of the father’s from a Rotary Club in Long Island [New Rochelle, to be precise]).

Yet Frank and his father seem “of a piece” in terms of their talents for not entirely playing by the rules. When Frank, alienated in a new school, pretends to be a substitute French teacher for some days, and the parents are called in by the principal to discuss the prank, the mother is suitably disapproving, but father and son share an appreciative chuckle.

It would appear that the parents’ split precipitates Frank’s life of con-artist crime. This is suggested in the film’s Wikipedia article. In real life, apparently, Frank Abagnale never saw his parents again after the running away shown at the end of the first ~25 minutes of the film. But in the film, Frank returns to his aging father a couple times—as if to try to win approval, especially in his interest to show he’s trying to “get it all back.” He means their middle-class lifestyle they’d originally be at or within grasp of.

These might seem small people (though maybe not by everyone’s standards today), and Frank’s con-game life might be darkly amusing as true-crime stories can be, especially one depicted in a sort of light/sometimes-comic way as this one is. But what’s really interesting is how the G-man after Frank tails Frank doggedly determined to get his man and, more interestingly, as can happen in such situations, the G-man and Frank come to bond in the way that can happen between law enforcer and someone living outside the normal rules of society. The G-man will later be key to Frank’s rehabilitation.

Frank also, we see, is a talented man—his attention to detail, so important to a forger, show up early: noticing the staining of wine on his parents’ carpet getting smeared in; or finding on the sofa the club pin of a man his mother is apparently having an affair with.


Tom Hanks in a tour de force performance

Tom Hanks provides a lot of color to his character, Carl Hanratty (according to the film’s Wikipedia article, there was no FBI agent Carl Hanratty in the real case, but there was an FBI agent named Sean O’Riley who was after Abagnale). Dressed in humorless, plain black “Establishment” pants and jacket (rather like a Blues Brother), Carl is truly a “square” individual, even if he develops a sort of “hip” fondness for Frank. (By the way, costumes were designed by Mary Zophres, the Coens’ preferred costumer.) Carl is humorless enough that his associates on the Abagnale case once make note of his humorlessness, to which he responds with a harsh joke.

But Hanks really plays up the workaday-stiff quality. You see him stand watching the clock, toward the end of the movie, when Frank isn’t in to his new job yet. He has that sort of bowed-out-belly, slightly splayed-feet look that a man gets whose posture is a bit like a rooster’s, when incidentally he no longer cares how un-sexy he looks. Or check him out when he is at the wedding party, helmed by the Louisiana lawyer played by Martin Sheen; in one brief scene, Hanks, Sheen, and the woman playing Sheen’s character’s wife are standing out in front of the big Victorian house, and Hanks’ Carl is moving around like a robotic chicken, nerdy/dignified/polite, each move squared. So even at a party, he is a stiff. He reminds you of the remark some commentator made a few years ago of Nixon seeming like someone who wore his wing-tips to the beach.

At other times, Hanks—usually so serious as Carl—can exhibit passing humor of a somewhat savage kind. When he and his associates are seated with Frank’s mother in her new household’s living room, and one associate hesitatingly keeps reaching for a fork and calling off the move, suddenly Carl intervenes and gets him a fork, then hands it to him as if he’s going to stab him with it. Hanks has been called an actor like a Gary Cooper (I guess, meaning with some wide, Everyman appeal), but it seems to me he can inhabit a character, quirks and all, so deeply that you almost don’t see how much he’s taken it upon himself to display someone else’s un-Hanks-like panoply of traits.


Details of the story arc

* DiCaprio’s Abagnale is a charmer, as I suppose con men so often are—he can get people into cooperating with him through friendly small talk, compliments (especially to women), and such little ploys as presenting a necklace he says he found in a parking lot, and it “must have slipped right off your neck!”—a trick he learned from his father. This trick doesn’t work equally well on everyone, but it does do well enough in one case to get him a rather “advanced date,” so to speak, with an apparently “easy” airline stewardess.

* Jennifer Garner turns up as a call girl Frank encounters one night in the corridor of a big hotel. The two young people show they are, sort of, peas in a pod in terms of being charming operators, and after he has invited her into his room—she is no dummy—and they are negotiating over what to pay her for a night, Frank ends up having her accept one of his bogus checks, with some cash back ($400 in change) out of her bosom-area “wallet.” (This could be said to exemplify something we can say characterizes an unsettling amount of U.S. business today: you don’t know who’s screwing whom.) But with her Jennifer Garner–style charm laminating a probable tough-operator personality, you figure Frank ought to be careful he doesn’t encounter her again. Her stiletto heels look like they could puncture a truck tire with one kick. (Ironically, this scene is intercut with glimpses of Carl Hanratty in one humdrum episode of his own nerdy life: lumping his time away in a Laundromat, getting his white shirts stained from some red whatsit that crept into his laundry from the woman using the machine next to his.)

* “You didn’t just call to apologize. You have no one else to call!” This line from Carl as he has a frank conversation with Frank (sorry for the pun), with Frank having apologized for tricking Carl at a Southern motor lodge, shows that an isolation Frank is in, and the sheer closing-in side of the chase relationship, is leading Carl to become a new father figure for Frank. This is a very interesting psychological component of the film. I defer commenting on this more, either as to this film’s specific handling of it or as to the phenomenon generally. Something of the same thing is seen in the fact that, in torture contexts, a sort of emotional identification, paradoxically, forms between the tortured and the torturer. This is a more violence-borne phenomenon that I would need to prepare even more to discuss. The bonding between Frank and Carl is one more borne of Frank’s neediness, and is a more innocuous kind. But in both the criminal and torturer situations, the bonding happens partly because the relationships are radically outside normal social norms.

* In a relatively late scene, Frank is at the Louisiana home of his girlfriend, a rather innocent nurse Brenda (played by Amy Adams) whom he has met at a Georgia hospital. At one point, a Sixties-era homey moment pops up like Jiffy Pop when Mitch Miller (do some of you remember him?) is on the TV, and it’s time to sing along with some old Irish ditty. Frank tries to play along, maybe sadly envious of such innocent family fellowship. Martin Sheen, as Brenda’s father, shows how courtly and fatherly he can be after his (Sheen’s, not the character’s) strenuous decades-old work in the likes of Apocalypse Now (1979). Frank has a somewhat similar “epiphany” when some old tune is on the radio and the nurse’s parents are in the kitchen, swaying enjoyably to the music. Frank sees the precious family life he has lost when his parents separated, and which in some desperate, devious way he is trying to recover (or replace) with his rich series of cons.

* I won’t say much about the cute repeated motif of the story about the two mice that “fell into a bucket of cream,” which Frank is first impressed with when his father uses it at a Rotary meeting. The father poignantly uses it later at a lunch that he and his “newly on the make” son have; and still later, Frank uses to an inadvertently humorous end, as a form of saying grace at Brenda’s family’s dinner table.